Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

2037

reference
84-tree-1
name
2037
tree-preservation-order

undefined

84-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.009694 50.854607)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.009637 50.854601,-1.009640 50.854612,-1.009648 50.854622,-1.009660 50.854631,-1.009676 50.854636,-1.009693 50.854638,-1.009711 50.854636,-1.009727 50.854631,-1.009739 50.854623,-1.009748 50.854613,-1.009751 50.854602,-1.009748 50.854591,-1.009740 50.854581,-1.009728 50.854573,-1.009712 50.854568,-1.009695 50.854566,-1.009677 50.854567,-1.009661 50.854572,-1.009648 50.854580,-1.009640 50.854590,-1.009637 50.854601)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL